New specialists and motorist eyewitnesses who made statements that Vorayuth “Boss” Yoovidhya did not drive his Ferrari over the speed limit and that the policeman who was killed abruptly cut in front of his vehicle are the key factors which convinced prosecutors to drop charges against the Red Bull heir.
In a leaked document outlining public prosecutors’ reasoning for their decision to drop the charge against Mr Yoovidhya of reckless driving causing death, information from the new witnesses was given more weight than previous evidence, including forensic results.
The document said Nate Naksuk, Chief Justice of the Department of Appellate Litigation in his capacity as acting attorney-general, signed the order to drop the charge.
After the statute of limitations of three charges expired, the National Legislative Assembly’s committee on justice and police affairs petitioned the Office of Attorney-General (OAG) for a fair investigation over the last charge, prompting the attorney-general to step in.
Mr Naksuk reviewed the investigation results and came to the conclusion the new evidence presented enough grounds to revoke the previous indictment order.
Based on a statement given by a police major who initially examined the speed the suspect’s Ferrari was travelling at an average of 177 kilometres per hour at the time of the hit-and-run, the margin for error was 17km/h.
The speed was beyond the legal limit of 80km/h and this led prosecutors to determine that Mr Yoovidhya was driving recklessly and indicted him on the charge of reckless driving causing death of which the statute of limitation would last until 2027.
Two new specialist witnesses, police majors, inspected the damage to the Ferrari and the victim’s motorcycle, compared it to other accidents, and agreed the Ferrari could not have been travelling at 170km/h at the time of the crash and was not exceeding 80km/h.
Another specialist who is a university engineering lecturer was brought in to calculate the speed of both vehicles involved in the crash in 2017. He told investigators the Ferrari was likely travelling at 76.175km/h.
In December last year, two other witnesses were interviewed. They told investigators they were driving behind the suspect and the victim just before the accident happened.
The victim was travelling at no more than 20km/h [as shown in CCTV footage] while Mr Yoovidhya was driving between 50-60km/h.
The statements from these two witnesses echoed those of the specialist witnesses, leading investigators to conclude the Ferrari was travelling at under 80km/h in the far-right lane.
Prior to the crash, the victim’s motorcycle, which was in the far-left lane, abruptly changed lanes. One of the witnesses who was driving a pickup truck at the middle lane had to brake and managed to swerve to the left to avoid hitting the motorcycle. According to his statement, the motorcycle then changed lanes and cut in front of the Ferrari in the far-right lane, causing the Ferrari to crash into the motorcycle.
Prosecutors said the crash was a “force majeure” and that “the victim’s reckless driving contributed to the crash”.
The prosecutors concluded the crash was not caused by reckless driving on the part of the suspect and the suspect did not commit an offence under Section 291 of the Criminal Code.
The decision reversed the prosecutors’ earlier decision to indict. The family of the victim reached a compensation agreement with the suspect.
Finest Selection of Cheeses in Chiang Mai